...will he ever win?

[first]  [prev]  page 20 of 20        [view as one page] 

Gizmag

UPenn's GRASP lab unleashes a swarm of Nano Quadrotors

The autonomous squadron made up of 20 quadrotor robots from KMel Robotics (Photo: Kmel Rob...

Remote-controlled quadrotor robots have been around for some time, but in the following video just released by a research team at the University of Pennsylvania's General Robotics, Automation, Sensing and Perception (GRASP) Lab, science fiction edges much closer to science fact. Displaying complex autonomous swarm behavior, the miniature craft perform some astounding maneuvers and provide an interesting glimpse into what the future may hold for surveillance, search and rescue, light construction and warfare. .. Continue Reading UPenn's GRASP lab unleashes a swarm of Nano Quadrotors

Section: Robotics

Tags: , , , ,

Related Articles:


February 02, 2012 02:28 AM


Linux Weekly News

[$] LWN.net Weekly Edition for February 2, 2012

The LWN.net Weekly Edition for February 2, 2012 is available.

February 02, 2012 01:26 AM


Ars Technica

Beyond ACTA: next secret copyright agreement negotiated this week—in Hollywood

One of the worst parts of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was its ridiculous secrecy, under which it was easy for negotiators and industry reps to see draft text, but impossible for the public to do so except through leaks. Thankfully, those leaks showed just how bad ACTA was going to be for the Internet, and public pressure helped remove the worst provisions.

But the basic approach to doing deals didn't die, and it's back again this week as negotiators meet in Hollywood to discuss a new, totally secret intellectual property chapter for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a regional trade agreement.

Civil society and digital rights groups would dearly love to be part of the process; barring that, they'd like to know simply what the process is so that they can at least mount press conferences of their own. But even that is difficult.

Read the rest of this article...

Read the comments on this post

February 02, 2012 12:30 AM

February 01, 2012


Ars Technica

Post-IPO, Facebook will have to make privacy investigations public

When it comes to information privacy concerns, Facebook already has a bullseye on its back. That won't change now that Facebook is going public in its highly anticipated Initial Public Offering (IPO). But disclosure rules affecting publicly traded companies may force Facebook to reveal privacy-related investigations that it otherwise might have kept secret.

Facebook won't face any new regulations or government oversight specifically related to privacy, according to the experts who spoke to Ars. But in the cases of inquiries from the Federal Trade Commission or attorneys general, investigations that might otherwise remain private would become public because Facebook will be forced to disclose events that could have a material impact on earnings.

Read the rest of this article...

Read the comments on this post

February 01, 2012 11:20 PM


Gizmag

RESPeRATE aims to let users breathe their way to lower blood pressure

RESPeRATE is a device that is designed to lower blood pressure by getting its users to bre...

People suffering from hypertension (also known as high blood pressure) are typically advised to switch to a healthier diet, get more exercise and lose weight, plus they are often put on a combination of several medications. As of today, UK residents are now also able to get a prescription for what is definitely a different type of treatment – a system known as RESPeRATE. It monitors the patient’s breathing and uses sound to guide them into taking longer, slower breaths, thus relaxing their bodies. According to its makers, multiple clinical trials have shown that it causes significant, lasting reductions in blood pressure... Continue Reading RESPeRATE aims to let users breathe their way to lower blood pressure

Section: Health and Wellbeing

Tags: , , ,

Related Articles:


February 01, 2012 11:13 PM

Mask stuffed with micro-components could work miracles for severe facial burn patients

Engineers and researchers at UT Arlington aim to develop a biomask that could revolutioniz...

Engineers and researchers at the University of Texas, Arlington in collaboration with military medical institutions aim to develop a mask that would use mechanical, electrical and biological components to speed up the healing process following severe facial burns. The flexible polymer face mold is to be fitted with sensors for the monitoring of the healing process. If necessary, embedded components would selectively administer the appropriate pharmaceuticals to the right section of the wound. The aim of the Biomask project is not only to prevent further disfigurement, but also to facilitate facial tissue regeneration in injured soldiers... Continue Reading Mask stuffed with micro-components could work miracles for severe facial burn patients

Section: Health and Wellbeing

Tags: , , , , ,

Related Articles:


February 01, 2012 10:51 PM


GoRobotics.net

30 Days Till The Cloud Robotics Hackathon. Hurry Up to Get a Free Robot!

On the weekend of March 2nd to March 4th, a Global Cloud Robotics Hackathon will be held in several cities around the world. This initiative is born in Montreal, Canada where the main event will be held but other cities are challenged to participate and to show off their robot hacking skills.

Cloud Robotics Hackathon

What is a “hackathon”?

The word “hackathon” is a combination of “hack” and “marathon” and designates an event where hackers, makers and tinkerers from teams and get together for a short time (a weekend for instance) to create and hack technology. The most hard-core hackers code and build during the entire event without sleeping and only taking minimal breaks.

What is this “cloud” thing?

“Cloud robotics” refers to the use of web services (that run on the internet, a.k.a. “the cloud”) in order to make robots smarter. This hackathon is focused in catalyzing the creation of cloud robotics applications by using the MyRobots.com API, Android, and ROS.

Why participate?

Many reasons: It is a fun opportunity to hack  and learn about cloud robotics, it brings roboticists to work with web developers and android programmers, and each team gets a FREE DFRobotShop Rover. If you want to be a hero in the robotics community and get started in the very exciting and emerging field of cloud robotics, register your team now! Find out more about the Cloud Robotics hackathon on roboticshackathon.com

February 01, 2012 10:32 PM


Ars Technica

Shoe on the other foot: RIAA wants to scrap anti-piracy OPEN Act

The Recording Industry Association of America found itself in an unusual position this week: opposing an anti-piracy bill that's gaining momentum in Congress.

"The OPEN Act does nothing" to stop online infringement and "may even make the problem worse," the industry group says in a statement it is circulating on Capitol Hill this week. "It does not establish a workable framework, standards, or remedies. It is not supported by those it purports to protect."

Read the rest of this article...

Read the comments on this post

February 01, 2012 10:15 PM

It's official: Facebook files for $5 billion IPO

Facebook is hoping investors will "like" the social network just as much as its users already do. Following a series of rumors that have multiplied in recent weeks, Facebook filed for Initial Public Offering (IPO) on Wednesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission at a value of $5 billion.

The impending IPO has been widely expected among investors and tech circles for some time, with the earliest rumors going back for years. Some expected the company to raise upwards of $100 billion (yes, you read that right—one hundred billion US dollars) but according to the company's S-1 filing with the SEC, Facebook is aiming for a much more reasonable $5 billion to start.

Read the rest of this article...

Read the comments on this post

February 01, 2012 10:03 PM


EFF News

What Actually Changed in Google’s Privacy Policy

It Shouldn't Take a Letter from Congress for Google to Give Straight Answers About Privacy Policy Changes

Last week, Google announced a new, simplified privacy policy. They did a great job of informing users that the privacy policy had been changed through emails and notifications, and several experts (including Ontario’s Privacy Commissioner Dr. Ann Cavoukian) have praised the shift toward a simpler, more unified policy. Unfortunately, while the policy might be easier to understand, Google did a less impressive job of publicly explaining what in the policy had actually been changed.  In fact, it took a letter from eight Representatives to persuade them to provide straightforward answers to the public about their new policy.   

Here’s what you need to know about the substantive changes in the new policy:

  1. Up until March 1, 2012, the data Google collected on you when you used YouTube was carefully cabined away from your other Google products. So, in effect, Google could use data they collected on YouTube to improve and customize the users’ YouTube experience, but couldn’t use the data to customize and improve user experience on, say, Google+.
  2. The same siloing took place for your search history. Previously, Google search data was kept separate from other products. Even when users were logged in, Google promised not to share the information they gathered about you from your Google search history when customizing their other products. Considering how uniquely sensitive user search history can be (indicating vital facts about your location, interests, age, sexual orientation, religion, health concerns, and much more), this was an important privacy protection. 

The new privacy policy removes the separation between YouTube, Google search, and other Google products. By describing the change as "treat[ing] you as a single user," Google intends to remove the privacy-protective separations from YouTube and Google search

Unfortunately, Google’s original explanation left much to be desired.  The policy’s overview page said nothing about the substantive changes that were occurring in the policy, and the FAQ was equally vague:

What’s different about the new Privacy Policy?

First, we’ve rewritten the main Google Privacy Policy from top to bottom to be simpler and more readable. The new policy replaces more than 60 existing product-specific privacy documents. This all should make it easier for you to learn about what data we collect and how we use it.

Second, the new policy reflects our efforts to create one beautifully simple, intuitive user experience across Google. It makes clear that, if you have a Google Account and are signed in, we may combine information you’ve provided from one service with information from other services. In short, we can treat you as a single user across all our products.

"Beautifully simple" and the ability to "treat you as a single user" don’t actually get at the kernel of what changed: that they are specifically enacting a change to how they treat data they collect through YouTube and search history. To be clear, they aren’t collecting more information, but they are sharing that information in a new way.

We were heartened to see the letter and Q&A Google published yesterday in response to the questions from Congress in which they gave straight answers about their new policy. They stated:

Specifically, our policies meant that we couldn’t combine data from YouTube and search history with other Google products and services to make them better. So if a user who likes to cook searches for recipes on Google, we are not able to recommend cooking videos when that user visits YouTube, even though he is signed in to the same Google Account when using both.

This is a great deal clearer than their original notification, so we applaud that. It’s unfortunate that it took a letter from Congress to get them to give the public straightforward explanations.

For individuals who would like to continue using Google products, but want to create some type of silo between Google search, YouTube, and other products, there is an option to set up multiple Google accounts. Users can set up two or more accounts as long as they have different Gmail addresses; however, individuals using this strategy to protect their privacy should be careful not to commingle-consider using separate browsers for each of your Google accounts. To be extra careful, users might want to use the Data Liberation tool to grab a copy of all of their data from a particular Google product, delete the data from the original account, and then upload that data onto the new account. For example, an individual might set up a secondary Google account for browsing and sharing YouTube videos. She could then download all of her existing YouTube videos to her computer, delete them from her primary Google profile, and then use a separate browser to upload them to a new secondary Google account. Unfortunately, this is a somewhat laborious process. To help users who wish to keep separate accounts, Google should make the process simpler and easier.

Users who are concerned about search privacy can find additional advice in our whitepaper: 6 Tips to Protect Your Search Privacy.

Related Issues: 

February 01, 2012 10:01 PM

[first]  [prev]  page 20 of 20        [view as one page]